Cases 1 - 10 of 221
Richardson v. Prime Care Employees
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
John J Richardson
Defendant:
Prime Care Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Register et al
as 1:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Daniel Register, John Addison Howard, Jennifer B. Schiffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Office of the States Attorney for Baltimore City et al
as 1:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Office of the States Attorney for Baltimore City, Baltimore City Office of the Clerk, Metropolitan Transition Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Bey v. Dellisauti et al
as 1:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
Dellisauti, Baltimore County Police Precinct 9 White Marsh, State's Attorney Baltimore County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Owens v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
Albert T. Owens, Jr.
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, R. Polk, Barns and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel Richardson v. FBI
as 23-2433
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL J. RICHARDSON
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and JOHN DOE AGENTS, JMZ-0456, JTV-0031, KHK-4064, LFT-1319
Littlefield v. Strange et al
as 2:2023cv00790
Plaintiff:
Joseph Tyler Littlefield
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Michelle Duncan, Jason Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03761
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1541
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
