Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Doe et al v. Perion et al
as 3:2026cv50313
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Jane Doe, D. D. and others
Defendant:
Bailee Perion, Tashinah Shade, Director Heidi E. Mueller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv80864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Turnbaugh v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 2:2026cv01566
Plaintiff:
Darlene Turnbaugh and Winford Eugene Turnbaugh
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Astrazeneca LP and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Sharp
as 26-4664
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MICHAEL PAUL SHARP
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2026cv80865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Sharpe v. Woody Anderson Ford
as 5:2026cv01263
Plaintiff:
Broderick Sharpe
Defendant:
Woody Anderson Ford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
MERCK SHARP & DOHME LLC v. APOTEX INC. et al
as 2:2026cv08996
Plaintiff:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME LLC
Defendant:
APOTEX INC. and APOTEX CORP.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Collaborations Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Sharp Sterile Manufacturing, LLC
as 3:2026cv13201
Plaintiff:
Collaborations Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Sharp Sterile Manufacturing, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Tillman v. Reed et al
as 5:2026cv00146
Plaintiff:
Michael Tillman
Defendant:
Clayton Straughn, Jeorge Gamez, David Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv00107
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
