Cases 1 - 10 of 775
(PC) Abdullah v. Casaurang et al
as 2:2024cv01223
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant:
A. Casaurang, Warden, Associate Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. McCoy et al
as 3:2024cv00136
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Carter
Defendant:
Kevin McCoy, C. J. Smith, C. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Lane et al
as 3:2024cv00376
Plaintiff:
Freddie J. Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Lane, Hale, Lance Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALLACE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
SHAWN WALLACE
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HARRY, L. HARRY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodloe v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv50083
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Goodloe
Defendant:
Officer J. Smith, Officer B. Disher, Inmate Artavis Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. IRWIN et al
as 1:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
DWAYNE HILL
Defendant:
WARDEN RANDY IRWIN, LIEUTENANT JOHN DOE, SERGEANT J.T. KRAFCZYNSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
HART v. DAVIS et al
as 3:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
RANDY A HART
Defendant:
S DAVIS, G ENGLISH, T DUDLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TEAGUE v. MITCHELL et al
as 3:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
THOMAS T. TEAGUE, SR.
Defendant:
DANNY MITCHELL, DIANE PHEIFFER, I. RANDOLPH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Osborn Correctional Institute
as 3:2024cv00563
Plaintiff:
Tyrone J Smith
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional Institute
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JETT v. SMITH et al
as 5:2024cv00040
Plaintiff:
EARNEST JETT and EARNEST JETT, JR
Defendant:
J SMITH, CHRIS FEILDER, RYISNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
