Cases 1 - 10 of 10
CANADA v. MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 4:2021cv00070
Defendant:
PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE OF MUSCOGEE COUNTY, MUSCOGEE COUNTY JAIL and MARK POST
Plaintiff:
ADAM J CANADA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canada v. Small Business Administration
as 1:2021cv00091
Plaintiff:
Ronnie J Canada
Defendant:
Small Business Administration
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Lewis Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Canada v. Small Business Administration
as 5:2020cv00999
Plaintiff:
Ronnie J Canada
Defendant:
Small Business Administration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
HICA Education Loan Corporation v. Canada
as 2:2013cv02284
Plaintiff:
HICA Education Loan Corporation
Defendant:
Pamela J Canada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gilmore v. Augustus, et al.
as 1:2012cv00925
Plaintiff:
C. Dwayne Gilmore
Defendant:
D. Augustus, J. S. Diaz, C. Lockard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CANADA et al v. RAYTECH CORPORATION
as 2:2011cv66895
Plaintiff:
GENE E. CANADA and ELSIE J. CANADA
Defendant:
RAYTECH CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tate v. Robinson et al
as 5:2009cv00223
Plaintiff:
Carl L Tate, Jr
Defendant:
Gerald Robinson, Ronnie Cole and J Canada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CANADA v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv74861
Plaintiff:
WALLACE J CANADA and WALLACE J CANADA
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Sebourn v. Jackson et al
as 5:2009cv00028
Plaintiff:
Michael Sebourn
Defendant:
Robert Jackson, Ed Adams, King and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Canada v. Correctional Medical Services Inc et al
as 1:2008cv00023
Plaintiff:
Yolonda J Canada
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services Inc, Donald Anderson, James Pratt and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
