Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Dugan Kinetics NV, L.L.C. v. Dugan et al
as 2:2013cv00007
Defendant:
John J. Dugan and Dugan Kinetics LLC
Plaintiff:
Dugan Kinetics NV, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Vaughan v. Sheeley et al
as 5:2012cv00123
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Vaughan
Defendant:
John Sheeley, F. Braggs and J. Dugan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troy J Dugan v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2011cv08145
Defendant:
Deputy Bender, County of Los Angeles, Does and others
Plaintiff:
Troy J Dugan
DUGAN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv65532
Plaintiff:
JOHN J DUGAN, JR and ANNA DUGAN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DUGAN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST et al
as 2:2011cv32370
Plaintiff:
DONALD J. DUGAN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST , A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ACMC F/K/A NATIONAL GYPSUM COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Ali Waris v. Joseph Frick, et al
as 10-4131
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALI WARIS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH FRICK, MICHAEL ZIPFEL, ANYA POLLARD and others
DUGAN et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv66190
Plaintiff:
MARY J. DUGAN and HARRY M. DUGAN
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., FLEXITALLIC, INC., GAF CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LNV Corporation v. Curry et al
as 2:2009cv02471
Plaintiff:
LNV Corporation
Defendant:
Mark E. Curry and William J. Dugan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dugan v. CMH Manufacturing, Inc. et al
as 6:2007cv00036
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Dugan and Daniel J. Dugan
Defendant:
CMH Manufacturing, Inc., CMH Manufacturing, Inc., CMH Homes, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Dugan v. McDonough et al
as 9:2007cv80511
Petitioner:
Robert J. Dugan
Respondent:
James R. McDonough and Bill McCollum
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
