Cases 11 - 20 of 251
Gonzalez v. Eischen
as 0:2023cv02718
Petitioner:
Christopher J Gonzalez
Respondent:
B. Eischen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Muthana et al v. DeAngelo et al
as 2:2023cv12255
Plaintiff:
Ali Musaid Muthana, Mikel Smith, Joshua Paradien and others
Defendant:
Jodi L DeAngelo, Zarie Phillips, J. Gonzalez and others
Gonzalez v. T-Mobile US, INC.
as 4:2023cv00375
Plaintiff:
Frankie J. Gonzalez
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
In re: T-Mobile 2022 Customer Data Security Breach Litigation
as 4:2023md03073
Plaintiff:
Judith Lynch, Frankie J. Gonzalez, Lisa Frierson and others
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc. and T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GONZALEZ et al v. JACOBSON et al
as 9:2023cv80837
Plaintiff:
YORLENE J. GONZALEZ and INDIRA M. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
REMY JACOBSON and REGINA JACOBSON
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
(PC) Brown v. Cerda-Jirano et al
as 1:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Aireon Elijah Brown
Defendant:
E. Cerda-Jirano, O. Valladolid, V. Sandoval and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sell v. Gonzalez
as 2:2023cv00326
Plaintiff:
Jacob Tomas Sell
Defendant:
J Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Gonzalez-Acevedo, et al v. US, et al
as 23-1217
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MANUEL J. GONZALEZ-ACEVEDO
Plaintiff:
EDMARIE MENDEZ-SALAS and AG
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES, US DEPT. OF HOMELAND SECURITY, IMMIGRATION CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
GONZALEZ v. T-MOBILE US, INC.
as 2:2023cv00367
Plaintiff:
FRANKIE J. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
T-MOBILE US, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
GONZALEZ v. T-MOBILE US, INC.
as NJ/2:23-CV-00367
Plaintiff:
GONZALEZ and FRANKIE J. GONZALEZ
Defendant:
T-MOBILE US, INC.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
