Cases 1 - 10 of 14
H. et al v. South Carolina Department of Social Services et al
as 0:2023cv04244
Plaintiff:
B. D. H., B. J. H. and W. H.
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Social Services, Michael Leach, Tenevia Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Ray v. State of North Carolina et al
as 5:2022cv00379
Plaintiff:
James Shelton Ray, Jr.
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Mr. Joshua Stein, Town of Cary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (National Origin)
Helms et al v. Cherokee County et al
as 1:2021cv00288
Plaintiff:
Libby Helms, A. H., J. H. and others
Defendant:
Cherokee County, Scott Lindsay, Donna Crawford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Delaney v. J. H. Thaxton et al
as 2:2018cv01299
Plaintiff:
Charles Delaney
Defendant:
J. H. Thaxton, Kanawha County Commission and Kanawha County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
H. et al v. Smith et al
as 8:2018cv00243
Plaintiff:
A. H. , J. H. and E. H.
Defendant:
Jack R. Smith and Montgomery County Board of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
My'Ka El v. R. Reese
as 17-2300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MY'KA EL
Defendant - Appellee:
R. REESE, Officer
Defendant:
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, M. SULLIVAN, Officer, S. SELOGY, Officer and others
My'Ka El v. R. Reese
as 17-6397
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MY'KA EL
Defendant - Appellee:
R. REESE, Officer
Defendant:
CHARLOTTE MECKLENBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, M. SULLIVAN, Officer, S. SELOGY, Officer and others
Iraldo v. Smith
as 2:2014cv00126
Plaintiff:
Dahson D. Iraldo
Defendant:
Officer J. H. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
