Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jensen et al v. Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00129
Plaintiff:
Shari L. Jensen and Jarel J. Jensen
Defendant:
Nebraska Methodist Health System, Inc. doing business as Methodist Health System, The Nebraska Methodist Hospital, Radiologic Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jensen v. Hacker
as 4:2021cv00942
Petitioner:
Daniel J. Jensen
Respondent:
Denise Hacker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
United States of America v. $24,020.00 in U.S. Currency, $15,080.00 in U.S. Currency, and $3,380.00 in U.S. Currency
as 3:2021cv00027
Defendant:
$24,020.00 in U.S. Currency, $15,080.00 in U.S. Currency, and $3,380.00 in U.S. Currency
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Claimant:
Erickah J. Jensen
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
James Jensen, et al v. MN Dept. of Human Services, et al
as 20-1399
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Darren Allen, as parents, guardians and next friends of Thomas M. Allbrink and others similarly situated, James Brinker, James Jensen and others
Defendant:
Director, Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a program of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota, Clinical Director, the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a program of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota, Douglas Bratvold, individually, and as Director of the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a progam of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota and State of Minnesota
James Jensen, et al v. MN Dept. of Human Services, et al
as 20-1126
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Darren Allen, as parents, guardians and next friends of Thomas M. Allbrink and others similarly situated, James Brinker, James Jensen and others
Defendant:
Director, Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a program of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota, Clinical Director, the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a program of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota, Douglas Bratvold, individually, and as Director of the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a progam of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota and State of Minnesota
James Jensen, et al v. MN Dept. of Human Services, et al
as 17-2653
Plaintiff - Appellee:
James Jensen, Lorie Jensen, as parents, guardians and next friends of Bradley J. Jensen and others similarly situated, James Brinker and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota and State of Minnesota
Defendant:
Director, Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a program of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota, Clinical Director, the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a program of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota, Douglas Bratvold, individually, and as Director of the Minnesota Extended Treatment Options, a progam of the Minnesota Department of Human Services, an agency of the State of Minnesota and others
Global Tower, LLC et al v. Great Western Communications, LLC et al
as 8:2014cv00269
Defendant:
Christopher J. Jensen, LLC, Great Western Communications, LLC, JRS Associates, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GTP Infrastructure I, LLC and Global Tower, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GTP Infrastructure I, LLC v. Global Tower, LLC et al
as 8:2014cv00268
Defendant:
Christopher J. Jensen, LLC, Global Tower, LLC, Great Western Communications, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GTP Infrastructure I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
