Cases 1 - 10 of 770
Pina v. New York State Gaming Commission et al
as 1:2024cv05383
Defendant:
Sylvia B. Hamer, Marissa Shorenstein, Peter J. Martin J. Mack and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Pina
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 45 Federal Trade Commission Act (unfair or deceptive acts)
Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv02160
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Jennifer J. Martin
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hensley v. Teets, et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Catherine Hensley, as Administratrix of the Estate of Christopher Hensley,
Defendant:
Michael R Teets, Michael G Elizondo, Seth D Summey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Green v. Pen Fed Credit Union et al
as 4:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Dennis Green
Defendant:
Pen Fed Credit Union, Christopher J. Martin, Brian Cassin and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410 Right to Financial Privacy Act
Cross v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union, The et al
as 1:2024cv03209
Plaintiff:
Darryl Cross, Jr
Defendant:
Pentagon Federal Credit Union, The, John Dorn, Shashi Vohra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Washington v. State of Texas
as 24-40205
Plaintiff:
Jacque Kenshashwa Washington
Defendant:
State of Texas, City of Freeport, Texas, Brazoria County Court at Law No. 4 and others
PAULSEN v. O'MALLEY
as 2:2024cv00447
Plaintiff:
Joshua Benjamin Paulsen
Defendant:
O'Malley J. Martin and MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Martin v. Owens et al
as 6:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
Lisa J. Martin
Defendant:
Sue S. Owens and Charles T. Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Russell v. Gonzalez et al
as 3:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Jamelle Russell
Defendant:
M. Gonzalez, Garrett, Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
