Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Palmer v. Hodges et al
as 4:2023cv04044
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Defendant:
T Hodges, Deputy Warden J. Miners, Former Officer Brinkley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Miners et al
as 4:2023cv04041
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Defendant:
Deputy Warden J. Miners and Deborah Ann Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Miners et al
as 4:2023cv00323
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Defendant:
J Miners and Deborah Ann Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Palmer v. Hodges et al
as 4:2023cv00321
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Emerson Earl Palmer, II
Defendant:
T Hodges, J Miners, Brinkley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Rogers v. Hodge et al
as 4:2020cv04046
Defendant:
Warden T. Maxwell, Deputy Warden J. Miners, Tina Hodge and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Daniel Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MINER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv37187
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DELMAR J MINER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MINER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2019cv18408
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
BETTY J. MINER
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
C & J Minerals, LLC v. EQT Production Company
as 19-1917
Defendant / Appellee:
EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY
Plaintiff / Appellant:
C & J MINERALS, LLC
C&J Minerals, LLC v. EQT Production Company
as 5:2018cv00149
Plaintiff:
C&J Minerals, LLC
Defendant:
EQT Production Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
