Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Conley-Reifer et al v. Sykes et al
as 2:2026cv00928
Plaintiff:
Skylar Annabell Conley-Reifer and Carlos Francisco Lopez
Defendant:
E. Sykes, Sr., P. Garrett, A. Graves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Murzike v. J. Taylor, et al
as 26-12596
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
J. TAYLOR, R GREEN, MATTOX and others
Putney v. ARIZONA BEVERAGES USA, LLC et al
as 2:2026cv00370
Plaintiff:
Darick Putney
Defendant:
ARIZONA BEVERAGES USA, LLC, REFRESCO BEVERAGES US INC. and REFRESCO US HOLDING INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
James Murzike v. J. Taylor, et al
as 26-11174
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
J. TAYLOR, R GREEN, MATTOX and others
Sievers v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2026cv00058
Plaintiff:
Mark D. Sievers
Defendant:
Dr. Verona, Dr. Asbelti Llorens, Ms. Jessica Putney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Altidor v. McCall et al
as 3:2026cv00016
Plaintiff:
Princeo Laquinton Altidor, Sr.
Defendant:
Nurse Connie McCall, Doctor Jessica Putney, Lieutenant Elias Encarnacion and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
POWER v. PHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 1:2025cv00186
Plaintiff:
KARLIE ANNE POWER
Defendant:
PHOEBE PUTNEY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, KAYLA SHARPE, JONATHAN ALLIGOOD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Putney v. Parsons et al
as 4:2025cv04216
Plaintiff:
Hubert Putney
Defendant:
Curtis Parsons, Jason Chenowenth, . Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kareem Milhouse v. John Doe et al
as 5:2025cv03314
Plaintiff:
Kareem Milhouse
Defendant:
John Doe, Jane Doe, C. Putney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00149
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
