Cases 1 - 10 of 229
J.S.S. v. Northern Oregon Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
J. S. S.
Defendant:
Northern Oregon Corrections and Josue Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Credit Acceptance Corp. et al
as 6:2023cv05842
Plaintiff:
Kijanai Thomas
Defendant:
Credit Acceptance Corp., Autotama, Inc., Carolina Pro Recovery, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
YOUNGBLOOD v. SANTIAGO et al
as 3:2023cv12143
Plaintiff:
JIMMIE LEE YOUNGBLOOD
Defendant:
J SANTIAGO, DEBRA PERRY, J S EDWARDS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00182
Defendant:
M. D. Sturgill, David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NUNEZ v. LEAVINS et al
as 4:2021cv00101
Defendant:
MAXIE, JOHN DOE #20, BISHOP and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN NUNOZ and JONATHAN NUNEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wood v. Clarke et al
as 7:2021cv00061
Defendant:
A. David Robinson, K. Breeding, Harold W. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Jameson James Wood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Day et al
as 4:2020cv07968
Defendant:
M. Sherman, Tyeakey, Bob Klotz and others
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pattioay v. Frink et al
as 2:2020cv01214
Plaintiff:
Matthan J S Pattioay and Matthan James Sumons Pattioay
Defendant:
Unknown Zollinger, Unknown Frink, Unknown Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. THE PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2020cv00794
Defendant:
MR. KNEPPER, THE PA. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, C.O. 1 BAGAN and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00637
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
