Cases 1 - 7 of 7
AUSTIN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv22364
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
NATALIE AUSTIN, EMANUEL AVERY, BARRY BARTON and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
AUSTIN et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 2:2023cv04132
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Plaintiff:
NATALIE AUSTIN, EMANUEL AVERY, BARRY BARTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hodge et al v. Scarbrough et al
as 5:2019cv00160
Plaintiff:
Douglas M. Hodge, Mark Mullins and Micheal Barnett
Defendant:
J. J. Scarbrough and Brandon Finch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Portlock v. Washington County Detention Center et al
as 5:2013cv05287
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Anthony Portlock
Defendant:
Washington County Detention Center, T. Muggey, D. Brannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for the registered holders of GSAMP Trust 2006-NC2, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-NC2 v. Scarbrough et al
as 1:2010cv05458
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for the registered holders of GSAMP Trust 2006-NC2, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-NC2
Defendant:
Robert J Scarbrough and Kathleen B Scarbrough
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCARBROUGH v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv33990
Plaintiff:
JACK J. SCARBROUGH
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Butturini et al v. Blakney et al
as 3:2008cv00128
Plaintiff:
Jack Butturini and Katharine Butturini
Defendant:
Brian Blakney, T. J. Scarbrough, Jimmy Davis and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
