Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Willie Stevens v. Harold Clarke
as 22-6906
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIE J. STEVENS
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE and L. PEREZ, Correctional Officer-Green Rock Corr. Center
Stevens v. Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 7:2021cv00570
Plaintiff:
Willie J. Stevens
Defendant:
Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections and L. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Cartiledge et al
as 1:2017cv00729
Plaintiff:
Skyler Hall
Defendant:
Leroy Cartiledge, Frank Musier, Allison Glidewell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LITTLE v. NC GUILFORD COUNTY et al
as 1:2016cv00375
Plaintiff:
KENNETH EARL LITTLE
Defendant:
NC GUILFORD COUNTY, CUPID, WATKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perlmutter et al v. Varone et al
as 8:2014cv02566
Plaintiff:
Dawn Perlmutter and Thomas M. Bolick
Defendant:
Trina Varone, Jeffrey Varone, Gary Altman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jack v. Smith et al
as 3:2014cv00486
Plaintiff:
James L. Jack
Defendant:
Connie C. Smith, Daniel J. Stevens and Bubble Settles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv06608
Plaintiff:
Vera J. Stevens and Jerry Stevens
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc. and Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stevens et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2014cv01427
Plaintiff:
Shannon R. Stevens and Ricky J. Stevens
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stevens v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv01150
Plaintiff:
Sarah J. Stevens
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Stevens v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv01210
Plaintiff:
Carma J. Stevens
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
