Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00317
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Franklin v. Johnson et al
as 2:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Imare' Damu' F.J. Franklin
Defendant:
William Bill Johnson, Rebecca J. Walden and District Attorney's of Glynn County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eckerd v. Jump et al
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Andrew William Eckerd
Defendant:
Sheriff E. Neal Jump, Rebecca J. Walden, Roger B. Lane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White III v. NDOC - Medical Director et al
as 2:2023cv01441
Plaintiff:
Toney A. White III
Defendant:
NDOC - Medical Director, James Dzurenda, NDOC Medical Admin. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Siler v. Monroe
as 23-7063
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL D. SILER
Defendant / Appellee:
Officer J. WALDEN and Officer EDWIN LOPEZ
Defendant:
Officer MONROE, Officer JOHN DOE, Superintendent LEROY FIELDS and others
Siler v. Monroe et al
as 7:2020cv05794
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Officer Monroe, Superintendent Leroy Fields and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Siler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Smith v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 3:2016cv01451
Plaintiff:
Andre Smith
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, J. D. Kent, A. S. Napir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walden v. Boston Scientific Corp.
as 2:2014cv26681
Plaintiff:
Emma J. Walden
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALDEN v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP. et al
as 2:2014cv05363
Plaintiff:
EMMA J. WALDEN
Defendant:
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORP.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
