Cases 11 - 20 of 24
James Brock v. John Darr
as 17-11384
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES L. BROCK
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN DARR
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00038
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Brock v. Recovery Systems Inc
as 3:2016cv02147
Plaintiff:
James Daniel Brock
Defendant:
Recovery Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
BROCK v. DARR
as 4:2016cv00213
Petitioner:
JAMES L BROCK
Respondent:
JOHN DARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00207
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00651
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nansel et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv09021
Plaintiff:
Loyd K. Nansel , Loyd K. Nansel Trust , Ronald M. Bartek and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nansel et al v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv02134
Plaintiff:
Loyd K. Nansel , Loyd K. Nansel Trust , Ronald M. Bartek and others
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Huston v. Baptist Health System et al
as 2:2014cv02232
Plaintiff:
Michael Huston
Defendant:
Baptist Health System, James C. Brock and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. First Citizens Bank and Trust Company Inc et al
as 4:2013cv00598
Plaintiff:
Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Defendant:
First Citizens Bank and Trust Company Inc, Imperial Services Group Inc, James R Altman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
