Cases 61 - 70 of 425
GARCIA v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv01544
Defendant:
PETER MCNEILLY, JOE BIDEN, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA v. BIDEN et al
as 1:2021cv01496
Defendant:
PETER MCNEILLY, JOE BIDEN, CITY AND COUNTY OF DENVER and others
Plaintiff:
MIGUEL ANTONIO GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doutherd v. United Parcel Service Freight et al
as 2:2021cv00780
Defendant:
Shaquita Andrews, United Parcel Service Freight, United Parcel Service, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Doutherd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garcia v. Denver Police et al
as 1:2021cv01170
Defendant:
James Anderson, Denver Police, Clark Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv01252
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv14002
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JAMES ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. Turn Key Health Services et al
as 4:2021cv00136
Defendant:
Turn Key Health Services and Rowdy Sweets
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wild Fish Conservancy v. Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife et al
as 2:2021cv00169
Defendant:
Larry Carpenter, Donald McIsaac, Molly Linville and others
Plaintiff:
Wild Fish Conservancy
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 1538
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv05568
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERSON v. WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv03152
Defendant:
KRISTINE G. PRYOR, KELLY LOVEAL, WEXFORD OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
