Cases 41 - 50 of 101
Burns v. Osceola County Corrections Department et al
as 6:2016cv00045
Plaintiff:
James Burns
Defendant:
Osceola County Corrections Department, Officer Mazepas, Officer Woolett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Osceola County Corrections Department
as 6:2015cv02080
Plaintiff:
James Burns
Defendant:
Osceola County Corrections Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Armor et al
as 6:2015cv01966
Plaintiff:
James Burns
Defendant:
Armor, Dr. Adams, Nurse Carol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. William Burns, II
as 15-50868
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM JAMES BURNS, II
Burns et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv07130
Plaintiff:
Linda Burns and James Burns
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aclin et al v. Pd-Rx Pharmaceuticals Inc et al
as 5:2015cv00561
Plaintiff:
Kurt Aclin , Beverly Aclin , Alice Adams and others
Defendant:
Pd-Rx Pharmaceuticals Inc , Physicians Dispensing RX Inc , Eli Lilly and Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ross Stores, Inc. v. The Joyce C. Pearson Revocable Trust of 2003 et al
as 3:2015cv02110
Defendant:
The Joyce C. Pearson Revocable Trust of 2003, James Burns, Trustee of the Joyce C. Pearson Revocable Trust of 2003, Elizabeth Gould, Trustee of The Joyce C. Pearson Revocable Trust of 2003 and others
Plaintiff:
Ross Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
In re: Newsome
as 14-5125
Petitioner:
P. DAVID NEWSOME, JR., Liquidating Trustee of Mahalo Energy (USA), Inc.
Respondent:
WILLIAM GALLACHER, DUNCAN CHISHOLM, GARY H. DUNDAS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07508
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burns v. Coleman et al
as 6:2014cv03199
Plaintiff:
Michael James Burns
Defendant:
Coleman, Price, Ice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
