Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Harmon v. State of Alaska
as 1:2023cv00009
Petitioner:
James D. Harmon
Respondent:
State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HARMON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv31992
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES D HARMON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harmon v. Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00215
Plaintiff:
James D. Harmon
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Harmon v. Bruno Stolc
as 10-17666
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES D. HARMON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRUNO STOLC, Warden
Michael F. St. Pierre Revocable Trust et al v. Mission Trust Services, LLC et al
as 3:2010cv00824
Plaintiff:
Michael F. St. Pierre Revocable Trust , Dennis Dupray , Hans A. Stenfert Kroese and others
Defendant:
Mission Trust Services, LLC, Mission Residential LLC, Mission Residential Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harmon v. Stolc
as 2:2010cv01186
Plaintiff:
James D. Harmon
Defendant:
Bruno Stolc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harmon v. Stolc
as 3:2010cv02233
Plaintiff:
James D. Harmon
Defendant:
Bruno Stolc
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harmon v. Marku
as 10-1126
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James D. Harmon, Jr. and Jeanne Harmon
Defendant - Appellee:
Marvin Markus, individually and in his official capacity as Member and Chair of the New York City Rent Guidelines Board, City of New York and Deborah Van Amerongen, individually and in her official capacity as Commissioner, Division of Housing & Community Renewal, State of New York
Harmon et al v. Markus et al
as 1:2008cv05511
Plaintiff:
James D. Harmon, JR. and Jeanne Harmon
Defendant:
Marvin Markus and Deborah Van Amerongen
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
