Cases 11 - 20 of 926
Tyrrell et al v. Nagy et al
as 2:2024cv10250
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Thomas, Steven Sanchez, John Warren Ross and others
Defendant:
Richard Lee Robinson, William Charles Valkema, Creston Jerome Hicks and others
Petitioner:
Bobbie Maxwell, Benjamin Ballge, Richard Schall and others
Probst v. Beckett
as 2:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
James Edward Probst
Defendant:
A Beckett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Russell v. USA
as 5:2024cv00026
Petitioner:
James Edward Russell, III
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Scott v. Nevada Department of Corrections
as 3:2024cv00018
Plaintiff:
James Edward Scott
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sandford III v. Warden
as 9:2024cv00025
Petitioner:
James Edward Sandford, III
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv00814
Plaintiff:
James Edward Lewis
Defendant:
United States of America, Correctional Officer C. Via, Correctional Officer P. Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Cox v. Drumwright et al
as 5:2023cv05217
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cox
Defendant:
Corporal Drumwright, Lieutenant Atchley, John Doe Mail Log Deputy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Arkansas Community Corrections et al
as 5:2023cv05196
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cox
Defendant:
Arkansas Community Corrections, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Escobar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Arkansas Community Corrections et al
as 6:2023cv06112
Plaintiff:
James Edward Cox
Defendant:
Arkansas Community Corrections, Arkansas Department of Corrections, Escobar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
