Cases 31 - 40 of 50
Hammonds v. Thaler
as 4:2012cv00673
Petitioner:
Michael James Hammonds
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rag and Bone Holdings LLC v. James Hammonds
as 2:2012cv08794
Defendant:
James Hammonds
Plaintiff:
Rag and Bone Holdings LLC
Hammonds v. Thaler
as 4:2012cv03060
Petitioner:
Michael James Hammonds
Respondent:
Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rogers v. Buchanan et al
as 3:2012cv02458
Defendant:
Kate LNU, Sheriff Johnny Brown, Deputy Chief John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Floyd Rogers, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv08636
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Cook v. Hammond et al
as 5:2010cv00471
Plaintiff:
Fred H. Cook, Sr.
Defendant:
James Hammond and FNU Medlin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Hammond v. V. Almager, et al
as 09-56950
Petitioner - Appellant:
JAMES HAMMOND
Respondent - Appellee:
V. M. ALMAGER, Warden and M. SMELOSKY, Warden
General Electric Capital Corporation v. Hammond et al
as 9:2009cv00407
Plaintiff:
General Electric Capital Corporation
Defendant:
James Hammond and J Stephen Levkoff
Cause Of Action: Diversity
BARLOW, et al v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
as 1:2002cv01077
Counter Defendant:
DARREN ALLGOOD, TRACY BARLOW, JAMES BEEDIE and others
Plaintiff:
DARREN ALLGOOD, TRACY BARLOW, JAMES BEEDIE and others
213) 481-1554 (fax:
Carrie J. Rognlien, Carrie J. Rognlien, Carrie J. Rognlien and others
Counter Claimant:
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
Unknown:
Ignacia S. Moreno, Ignacia S. Moreno and Susan C. Nystrom
Defendant:
GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
