Cases 1 - 10 of 363
Robinson v. NRHA et al
as 2:2023cv00662
Plaintiff:
Vickie L. Robinson
Defendant:
NRHA, Alex, James Lynn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Robinson v. Direct TV Internet et al
as 2:2023cv00664
Plaintiff:
Vickie L. Robinson
Defendant:
Direct TV Internet, James Lynn, Alex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Buckmaster v. Dolgencorp LLC
as 5:2023cv00779
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Buckmaster
Defendant:
Dolgencorp LLC doing business as Dollar General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Crawford v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2023pq02144
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Crawford
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, Chevron U.S.A. Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hines v. Newsom et al
as 3:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
Gov. Gavin Newsom and Does 1 through 6
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Lynn v. Caldwell
as 3:2022cv00032
Petitioner:
James Lynn
Respondent:
Antoine G. Caldwell and Brian Chambers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
James Lynn Hines v. State Of California et al
as 2:2022cv00925
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Defendant:
State Of California, Gov Doug Ducey, Gov Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Hines v. Newsom et al
as 3:2021cv00882
Defendant:
City Attorney, San Diego County Probation Dept., City of San Diego and others
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Lynn v. Missouri Department of Corrections
as 2:2020cv04246
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Clinton James Lynn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hines v. State of Calif.
as 3:2020cv02107
Defendant:
State of Calif.
Plaintiff:
James Lynn Hines
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
