Cases 1 - 10 of 42
HUMPHREY v. MOODY et al
as 7:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HUMPHREY
Defendant:
JAMES MOODY, ASHLEY KERN and RODNEY FOULKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MOODY v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13048
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOODY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10254
Plaintiff:
STEVEN JOHNSON, SETH LACROIX, IVAN MAY and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01233
Plaintiff:
Steven Johnson, Seth Lacroix, Ivan May and others
Defendant:
3M Company
KIM et al v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2023cv02072
Plaintiff:
JU-HO KIM and VINCENZO CAMPO
Defendant:
PHILIP MURPHY, MRS. PERCWICELLI, PATRICK CALLAHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rankins v. Progressive Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2022cv00689
Plaintiff:
Arthur Rankins
Defendant:
Progressive Specialty Insurance Company, John 316 Pallets LLC and James Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Hicks v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
Brian James Hicks
Defendant:
Joe Griffin, James Moody, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Does
as 2:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Does Law Clerk to Judge Billy Roy Wilson, Law Clerk to Judge James Moody and Magistrate Judge Joe Volpe, and EDAR Filing Clerks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Librace v. Moody et al
as 4:2021cv01198
Plaintiff:
David Librace
Defendant:
James Moody and Billy Roy Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOODY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24211
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOODY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
