Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Mott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2026at02665
Plaintiff:
James Mott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
(SS) Mott v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv02357
Plaintiff:
James Mott
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pineville Firefighters Local 1384 et al v. Pineville
as 1:2020cv01111
Plaintiff:
Mark Warren, Richerd Deen, Joshua Bordelon and others
Defendant:
City of Pineville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
MOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv23277
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES MOTT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nieblas et al v. Porch.com Incorporated et al
as 4:2020cv00171
Plaintiff:
Patrick Coco, Paul Ryals, Ann Taylor and others
Defendant:
Porch.com Incorporated, Matthew Ehrlichman, GoSmith Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv04044
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Samuel Rosen v. Property Advantage Partners, et al
as 13-56409
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SAMUEL ROSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
PROPERTY ADVANTAGE PARTNERS, MELISSA PRANDI, JAMES MOTT and others
Rosen v. Property Advantage Partners et al
as 3:2013cv01027
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rosen
Defendant:
Property Advantage Partners, Mellisa Prandi, James Mott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rosen v. Property Advantage Partners et al
as 3:2013cv00864
Plaintiff:
Samuel Rosen
Defendant:
Property Advantage Partners, Melissa Prandi, James Mott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ed Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Key v. Mott et al
as 1:2012cv00614
Plaintiff:
Jonie Key
Defendant:
James Mott , The Town of Mount Vernon , Jerry C. Lundy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
