Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Edward Price v. Erie County Courthouse, et al
as 23-2801
Plaintiff / Appellant:
EDWARD JAMES PRICE
Defendant / Appellee:
ERIE COUNTY COURTHOUSE, HON STEPHANIE DOMITROVICH, Honorable, in her official capacity, ELIZABETH KELLY, in her official capacity and others
PRICE v. CITY OF ERIE, et al
as 1:2023cv00190
Defendant:
EDWARD JAMES PRICE and CITY OF ERIE, PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PRICE v. ERIE COUNTY COURTHOUSE et al
as 1:2023cv00025
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JAMES PRICE
Defendant:
ERIE COUNTY COURTHOUSE, HON STEPHANIE DOMITROVICH, ELIZABETH KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PRICE v. MERCER COUNTY PRISON
as 1:2023cv00026
Defendant:
EDWARD JAMES PRICE and MERCER COUNTY PRISON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
PRICE v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2022cv02472
Plaintiff:
JAMES PRICE
Defendant:
REAGLE and DAUSS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv20705
Plaintiff:
William James Price
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Price v. Douglas County Corrections
as 8:2021cv00389
Plaintiff:
Michael James Price
Defendant:
Douglas County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Price v. Douglas County Corrections
as 8:2021cv00355
Plaintiff:
Michael James Price
Defendant:
Douglas County Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Day et al v. Lumpkin
as 3:2021cv00015
Plaintiff:
George Wesley Savro, Shannon Day, Chrles Ray Jones and others
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King, Carlos et al v. Landreman, Steven et al
as 3:2019cv00338
Plaintiff:
James Price, Craig Alan Sussek, Victoriano Heredia and others
Defendant:
Mark Heise, Danielle LaCost, Steven Landreman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
