Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Tillman v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv00175
Plaintiff:
James Tillman
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
TILLMAN v. TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv06290
Plaintiff:
JAMES TILLMAN
Defendant:
TEVA BRANDED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTS R&D, INC., TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
In Re:
ELMIRON (PENTOSAN POLYSULFATE SODIUM) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gardner et al v. Caddo Parish
as 5:2021cv02158
Plaintiff:
Alvin Gardner, Timothy Cage, Rodney Holloway and others
Defendant:
Caddo Parish School Board and School Board of Caddo Parish
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TILLMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv39956
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES TILLMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TILLMAN v. HAINSWORTH
as 3:2017cv00242
Petitioner:
JEFFREY JAMES TILLMAN
Respondent:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Starks v. McPeake et al
as 5:2017cv00533
Plaintiff:
Terence Ronald Starks
Defendant:
James Tillman McPeake , Pictsweet Company, The and United Express
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Shelton v. Tillman
as 17-326
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Joseph Kennard Shelton
Defendant - Appellee:
James Tillman and Federal Bureau of Prison
Shelton v. Tillman et al
as 1:2016cv08188
Defendant:
James Tillman and The Federal Bureau of Prison Inc.
Plaintiff:
Joseph Kennard Shelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
US v. James Tillman
as 14-7902
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES TILLMAN
Tillman v. USA - 2255
as 8:2014cv03315
Petitioner:
James Tillman
Respondent:
USA - 2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
