Cases 21 - 30 of 54,340
Mills v. Precythe et al
as 4:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Desmond Arnez Mills
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Pugh v. Devos et al
as 3:2024cv05376
Plaintiff:
Lisa Marie Pugh
Defendant:
Keith Devos, Tabitha Yockey, Shawn Candella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wojciechowski v. Howard R. Young Correctional Institution et al
as 1:2024cv00596
Plaintiff:
Patrick James Wojciechowski
Defendant:
Howard R. Young Correctional Institution, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jane Doe v. Pine Richland School District
as 24-1898
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE
Defendant:
PINE RICHLAND SCHOOL DISTRICT
Moli v. King County - State of Washington, et al.
as 24-3155
Plaintiff:
FUAMATALA MOLI
Defendant:
KING COUNTY - STATE OF WASHINGTON, KING COUNTY METRO TRANSIT and JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-10
Domni v. County of Nassau
as 24-1324
Plaintiff:
LEK DOMNI
Defendant:
COUNTY OF NASSAU, Police Officer CHRISTOPHER LAMONICA, Police Officer FREDERICK TRIFARO and others
Sharif v. Swindling, et al.
as 24-3153
Plaintiff:
MUHSIN SHARIF
Defendant:
ALEX SWINDLING, JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-3, Police Officers with the Eugene Police Department, ALEC SWINDLING and others
Doe No.1 et al v. Rajveer LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #2, Jane Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
RAJVEER LLC, ATHARV, LLC, RAJPRABHU HOTEL LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1589 Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA)
Phillips v. Polanco et al
as 7:2024cv02152
Plaintiff:
Marquis Phillips
Defendant:
Edwin Polanco, John Doe ADS L. and Jane Doe ADS L.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
