Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Butler v. Astrue
as 2:2012cv00035
Plaintiff:
Janet Butler
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Butler v. Depuy Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22504
Plaintiff:
Janet Butler
Defendant:
Depuy Inc , DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butler v. Depuy Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00900
Plaintiff:
Janet Butler
Defendant:
Depuy Inc., Depuy International Limited, Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Ward v. Butler
as 4:2010cv01641
Plaintiff:
Rasheema Ward
Defendant:
Janet Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Campbell v. Hooksett School District, et al
as 09-1959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIZABETH JUANITA CAMPBELL, by mother and friend of other J.P.E.H.
Defendant - Appellee:
HOOKSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT, CAROL SOUCY, JOANNE ESAU and others
Interested Party:
NH ATTORNEY GENERAL
Wal-Mart Stores Inc v. Stegall et al
as 2:2009cv00086
Plaintiff:
Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Defendant:
Jennifer Stegall, Alex Williams, Debra Kile and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
J.P.E.H. v. Hooksett School District
as 08-2504
Plaintiff - Appellant:
J.P.E.H., by his parent and next friend, Elizabeth Campbell and ELIZABETH JUANITA CAMPBELL
Defendant - Appellee:
HOOKSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT
Defendant:
CAROL SOUCY, JOANNE ESAU, JACQUELINE PERRA and others
BUTLER et al v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2008cv00084
Plaintiff:
PAUL BUTLER and JANET BUTLER
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. and JEFF FLEMING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Butler v. Astrue
as 4:2007cv03667
Plaintiff:
Janet Butler
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Butler v. Social Security Administration et al
as 4:2007mc00638
Plaintiff:
Janet Butler
Defendant:
Social Security Administration and Michael J Astrue
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
