Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Anderson et al v. South Carolina Commission for the Blind
as 3:2023cv06858
Plaintiff:
Olivia Anderson and Janice Smith
Defendant:
South Carolina Commission for the Blind
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv03333
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02794
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Melissa Mann v. Winston-Salem State University
as 17-1902
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MELISSA J. MANN
Defendant - Appellee:
WINSTON-SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY, An Agent of the State of North Carolina and JANICE SMITH, Individually
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv30589
Plaintiff:
Janice Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MANN V. WINSTON-SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY ET AL
as 1:2014cv01054
Plaintiff:
MELISSA J. MANN
Defendant:
WINSTON SALEM STATE UNIVERSITY and JANICE SMITH
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv17637
Plaintiff:
Janice Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Mentor Worldwide LLC et al
as 2:2014cv10859
Plaintiff:
Janice Smith and Brendan Smith
Defendant:
Mentor Worldwide LLC and Coloplast Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv21612
Plaintiff:
Janice Smith
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv04765
Plaintiff:
Janice Smith
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
