Cases 61 - 70 of 70
WALKER et al v. ORGANON USA, INC. et al
as 4:2010cv01215
Plaintiff:
TRISHA J. WALKER and Jason Walker
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc. , Organon Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. , Organon International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gonzalez v. J.C. Penny Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv02896
Defendant:
Cowan Bennett, J.C. Penny Company, Inc. and Jason Walker
Plaintiff:
Eduardo Gonzalez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
James Woods v. Charles Russ, et al
as 10-20378
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES WOODS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES RUSS, ARLENE PARCHMAN, DOUGLAS VANCE and others
Woods v. Russ
as 10-20378
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Woods
Defendant / Appellee:
Charles Russ, Arlene Parchman, Douglas Vance and others
WALKER et al v. ORGANON USA, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv02243
Plaintiff:
TRISHA J. WALKER and JASON WALKER
Defendant:
ORGANON USA, INC., ORGANON PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., ORGANON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woods v. Russ et al
as 4:2009cv02541
Plaintiff:
James Woods
Defendant:
Charles Russ, Arlene Parchman, Douglas Vance and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Lester et al
as 5:2009cv00107
Plaintiff:
Jason Walker
Defendant:
NFN Lester, NFN Pollard, Dickens County Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Performance Food Group Company v. Jones et al
as 3:2008cv00110
Plaintiff:
Performance Food Group Company
Defendant:
Matthew B. Jones and Jason Walker Mercier
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vaughn v. Manchester, TN, City of et al
as 4:2007cv00051
Plaintiff:
Phillip Vaughn and Phillip Vaughn
Defendant:
Manchester, TN, City of and Jason Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Walker v. Graham
as 1:2007cv02540
Petitioner:
Jason Walker
Respondent:
H. D. Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
