Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Summitt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02838
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Summitt, James C Smith, Charles Wesley Smith, III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Summitt et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv00682
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Summitt, James C Smith, Charles Wesley Smith, III and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Williams v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2023cv00241
Petitioner:
Jay Edward Williams
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Ronald Scott Good
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
The Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company v. Edwards
as 2:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
The Travelers Home and Marine Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jay Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Younker v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv03102
Plaintiff:
Jay Edward Younker
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
EDWARDS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11597
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN JAY EDWARDS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Jay Glenewinkel
as 20-50563
Defendant / Appellant:
Jay Edward Glenewinkel, also known as Jay Glenewinkel, also known as Jay E. Glenewinkel
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Younker v. Saul
as 1:2020cv03072
Plaintiff:
Jay Edward Younker
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
GARBUS v 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv00616
Plaintiff:
Mr. JAY EDWARD GARBUS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Garbus v. 3M Company
as 5:2019cv00064
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jay Edward Garbus
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
