Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Claire Miller-Simmons et al v. Princess Lodges, Ltd, et al
as 2:2020cv05608
Defendant:
Princess Lodges, Ltd, Does 1 through 50, inclusive, Copper River Princess Wilderness Lodge and others
Plaintiff:
Claire Miller-Simmons, Alice McMurrin, Jerry Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jerry Simmons v. LA Dept of Pub Sfty and Corr
as 19-30178
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JERRY SIMMONS
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND CORRECTIONS
Jerry Simmons v. Darrel Vannoy, Warden
as 18-30711
Petitioner - Appellant:
JERRY SIMMONS
Respondent - Appellee:
DARREL VANNOY, WARDEN, LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
Simmons v. Vannoy et al
as 2:2017cv12120
Plaintiff:
Jerry Simmons
Defendant:
Darryl Vannoy
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmons v. Louisiana Department Of Public Safety and Corrections
as 3:2017cv01396
Defendant:
Louisiana Department Of Public Safety and Corrections
Plaintiff:
Jerry Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simmons et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv08555
Plaintiff:
Karen K. Simmons and Jerry Simmons
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Walter Dodd, Jr. v. Jerry Simmons, et al
as 15-6145
Plaintiff - Appellee:
WALTER EARL DODD, JR.
Defendant:
JERRY SIMMONS
Defendant - Appellant:
CHARLES PIERCE, Officer
Simmons v. Mudford et al
as 4:2015cv04062
Plaintiff:
Jerry Simmons
Defendant:
Steve Mudford
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Simmons et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11821
Plaintiff:
Louise B. Simmons and Jerry Simmons
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. , Sofradim Production SAS and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
