Cases 11 - 20 of 24
James Alexander v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 15-60875
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EARL ALEXANDER
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, KEVIN RAYBORN, Board of Supervisors and (Chanceries) of Lawrence County, DAVID EARL JOHNSON, Board of Supervisors and (Chanceries) of Pearl River County and others
Alexander v. State of Mississippi et al
as 3:2015cv00129
Plaintiff:
James Earl Alexander
Defendant:
State of Mississippi, Kevin Rayborn, David Earl Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01630
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilson et al v. Neil
as 1:2013cv00745
Plaintiff:
Antonio Wilson , Gary Hudson , Shafter Jinks and others
Defendant:
Jim Neil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Stetser v. Sherry Jinks, et al
as 13-4053
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID STETSER
Defendant - Appellee:
SHERRY JINKS, Individ. & in her official capacity as a Police Officer in the Gloucester Township Police Department, GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP, GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03352
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
STETSER v. JINKS et al
as 1:2010cv03094
Plaintiff:
DAVID STETSER
Defendant:
SHERRY JINKS, GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP, GLOUCESTER TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solman v. Manzi et al
as 3:2010cv00729
Plaintiff:
Vance Solman, Sr
Defendant:
Richard Manzi, John Riccio, Robert Jinks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 10-5037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
