Cases 1 - 10 of 62
OBX2022-NQM6 TRUST v. HILL
as 2:2026cv03008
Plaintiff:
OBX2022-NQM6 TRUST
Defendant:
JOE HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1252 (a)(2) Injunction for Deportation
Hill v. Officer Romanych et al
as 7:2025cv04868
Plaintiff:
Joe Hill
Defendant:
Correction Officer Officer Romanych, Correctional Officer Officer Jones, Correction Officer Booking Search and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alford v. Horry County Police Department et al
as 4:2025cv04526
Plaintiff:
Billy Leon Alford
Defendant:
Horry County Police Department, Robert Lawson, Ryan Coggins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HILL JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27408
Plaintiff:
JOE HILL JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HILL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv29859
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOE HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Osborn v. Horry County Police Department et al
as 4:2019cv02765
Defendant:
Horry County Sheriff's Department, Jeannette Benton, Chief Joe Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Hafida Osborn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hill v. Quintana
as 5:2019cv00222
Petitioner:
Billy Joe Hill
Respondent:
Warden Quintana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. James Ramey
as 18-20432
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES RAMEY, also known as James Maceo Ramey, also known as James Maceo Ramey, II, also known as Jim Ramey, also known as Henry Ramey, also known as John Shuler, also known as Joe Hill, also known as Frank Bartuka
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
