Cases 1 - 10 of 84
Powell v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2023cv03344
Plaintiff:
John D Powell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wilkins et al v. Edison et al
as 3:2023cv00276
Plaintiff:
Quintarre L Wilkins, Denastya L Baker and Orlando Acosta
Defendant:
Andrew Edison, Paul Hoefker, Stephen Buttram and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Wilkins et al v. Attorney Keval Patel Law Firm et al
as 3:2023cv00088
Plaintiff:
Quintarre L Wilkins and Denastya L Wilkins
Defendant:
Attorney Keval Patel Law Firm, American Pointe Realty Limited, PennyMac Loan Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
BOWMAN v. RAWLE et al
as 1:2022cv01620
Plaintiff:
CHARLES BOWMAN
Defendant:
MARY RAWLE, THE CENTER FOR GESTALT DEVELOPMENT, INC., JOHN J. POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Powell v. Riverside Physician Services, Inc.
as 4:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
John S. Powell, Jr.
Defendant:
Riverside Physician Services, Inc. doing business as Riverside Medical Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Medical Malpractice
Powell v. Ector County
as 22-50205
Plaintiff / Appellant:
John Anderson Powell
Defendant / Appellee:
Ector County, in its official capacity, Tony Bass, Chief Deputy, in his individual and official capacities, D. Jones, Retired, in individual and official capacities and others
US v. John Powell
as 22-4094
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN WEBB POWELL
US v. John Powell
as 22-4085
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN WEBB POWELL
Powell v. Ector County et al
as 7:2021cv00140
Plaintiff:
John Anderson Powell
Defendant:
Ector County, Tony Bass, D. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Powell v. Farris
as 21-6089
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN REGINALD POWELL
Respondent / Appellee:
JIM FARRIS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
