Cases 51 - 60 of 860
LU et al v. MAYORKAS et al
as 1:2023cv00715
Plaintiff:
ZHIYUE LU and HUIZHI BAI
Defendant:
ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, MERRICK GARLAND and JOHN ALLEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PS) Gigena v. Sexton et al
as 2:2023cv01661
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gigena
Defendant:
Andrea Sexton, Patrick M. Keene, John Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nelson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv05714
Plaintiff:
John Allen Nelson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05909
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
USA v. John Mays
as 23-5688
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JOHN ALLEN MAYS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05641
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv02527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv11422
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Nolze et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2023cv02836
Defendant:
Du Pont De Nemours Inc, 3M Company, AGC Chemicals Amercas Inc and others
Plaintiff:
William Nolze, Stephen Walter Miller, Randy Paul Miltier and others
Petitioner:
Arthur Thomas Noonan, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
