Cases 11 - 20 of 204
Sharples v. Bebout et al
as 3:2023cv00997
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Sharples
Defendant:
Sgt. Bebout, Lt. Bebout, Lt. Webb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sierra v. John Doe 22 et al
as 9:2022cv00711
Plaintiff:
Leonidas Sierra
Defendant:
John Doe 22, Captain Rzerniak, J. Fitchette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sierra v. John Doe 22 et al
as 6:2022cv06042
Plaintiff:
Leonidas Sierra
Defendant:
John Doe 22, Captain Rzerniak, J. Fitchette and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-1141
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Ronald McGugan v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD W. MCGUGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, JOHN DOE #1, Warden of Pocahontas, KEVIN PUNTUR, Current Warden and others
Wenzke v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01146
Plaintiff:
Christopher Wenzke
Defendant:
T-Mobile US, Inc., John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bassett v Blitt
as 1:2021cv10899
Defendant:
Cameron Rose doing business as Colton Grey, John Doe #14 doing business as Magdeline St. Michaels, Vivid Canada Entertainment, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Leah Bassett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
AUGUSTINE v. INCH et al
as 4:2021cv00123
Defendant:
MARK INCH, DAVIS, BAINE and others
Plaintiff:
JULIO AUGUSTINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NUNEZ v. LEAVINS et al
as 4:2021cv00101
Defendant:
MAXIE, JOHN DOE #20, BISHOP and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN NUNOZ and JONATHAN NUNEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
