Cases 81 - 90 of 507
Morgan v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Felicia Morgan and Bobby Morgan
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, County of Mecklenburg, Edward Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sims v. Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00003
Plaintiff:
Davon Sims
Defendant:
Greenwood Motor Lines, Inc. doing business as R & L Carriers, Inc., Paul Alan Van Der Werken, R&L Transfer, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Barnes v. Target Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv03548
Plaintiff:
Cinda Barnes
Defendant:
Target Corporation, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wise v. Kendall et al
as 6:2021cv03478
Plaintiff:
Cederick Jerome Wise
Defendant:
Brian Kendall, Albert Mackie, NyKeemah Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wise v. Kendall et al
as 6:2021cv03477
Plaintiff:
Cederick J. Wise
Defendant:
Warden Brian Kendall, Christopher Pondexter, NyKeemah Fields and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout et al v. Ofc. Barrow et al
as 3:2021cv00654
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Stout and Marc Stout
Defendant:
Ofc. Barrow, Ofc. Murphy, Ofc. Worley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald McGugan v. Harold Clarke
as 21-7448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD W. MCGUGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD CLARKE, JOHN DOE #1, Warden of Pocahontas, KEVIN PUNTUR, Current Warden and others
Grant v. Western Tidewater Regional Jail et al
as 1:2021cv01164
Plaintiff:
Abdul Grant
Defendant:
Western Tidewater Regional Jail, Sergeant Brinkley, Lieutenant Perry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GIBSON v. FREEMAN
as 1:2021cv00791
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. GIBSON, III
Defendant:
CHRIS FREEMAN, CAPTAIN SHANE BULLINS, SHERIFF SAM SCOTT PAGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Lopez et al
as 5:2021cv00413
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Richardson
Defendant:
Raul Lopez, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
