Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Fitil v. City of Omaha et al
as 8:2022cv00364
Plaintiff:
Tosun Mahmud Fitil
Defendant:
City of Omaha, Omaha Police Chief Todd Schmaderer and Officers Jane or John Does 1 - 21
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopez v. Doe 1:21-cv-073 et al
as 1:2021cv00073
Plaintiff:
Marcos Lopez
Defendant:
John Doe 1:21-cv-073 and Jane Doe 1:21-cv-073
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCrae v. City of Salem et al
as 6:2020cv01489
Defendant:
Chuck Bennett, Jane or John Does 1-21, City of Salem and others
Plaintiff:
Eleaqia McCrae
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robertson v. Sessions et al
as 5:2018cv00173
Plaintiff:
James P. Robertson, Jr.
Defendant:
Jeff Sessions and John Does 1-21
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ROBERTSON v. SESSIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00446
Plaintiff:
JAMES P. ROBERTSON, JR.
Defendant:
JEFFERSON BEAUREGARD SESSIONS, III and JOHN DOES 1-21
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Doe v. Avid Life Media, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv01920
Plaintiff:
John Does 1-21
Defendant:
Avid Life Media, Inc. and Avid Dating Life, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
IN RE: ASHLEY MADISON CUSTOMER DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
as 4:2015md02669
Plaintiff:
John Does 1-21, David Miller, Nhung Truong and others
Defendant:
Avid Dating Life, Inc., Noel Biderman, Barnes & Thornburg LLP and others
Petitioner:
Amicus Doe 1, Amicus Doe 3, Amicus Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
SINGLETON v. OAKLEY TRANSPORT, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv02765
Plaintiff:
CASSANDRA SINGLETON
Defendant:
OAKLEY TRANSPORT, INC. , JOHN DOES #1-21 and WALKER STAINLESS EQUIPMENT COMPANY, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
DALLAS BUYERS CLUB, LLC v. JOHN DOES 1-21
as 4:2014cv12600
Plaintiff:
DALLAS BUYERS CLUB, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-21
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
DALLAS BUYERS CLUB, LLC v. JOHN DOES 1-21
as 2:2014cv12598
Plaintiff:
DALLAS BUYERS CLUB, LLC
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-21
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
