Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-50121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Gregory #293155 v. Hall et al
as 2:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Jason D Gregory and Jason Darnell Gregory
Defendant:
Rodger Hall, G Murray Snow, John Z Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01458
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Thomas Powers v. James Shadid, et al
as 23-1741
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THOMAS POWERS
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES E. SHADID, SUE E. MYERSCOUGH, DIANE S. SYKES and others
Gregory v. United States of America et al
as 2:2022cv00999
Plaintiff:
Jason Darnell Gregory
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Marshals Service, John Z Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Townsend v. McClenny Moseley & Associates, PLLC
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Neal C. Townsend and Neal Townsend
Defendant:
McClenny, Moseley & Associates, PLLC, McClenny Moseley & Associates, PLLC, James M. McClenny and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Townsend Law, LLC
Counter Defendant:
Law Offices of Daniel R. Sanders LLC and Daniel R Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Cuculich v. Rigos
as 1:2021cv06752
Plaintiff:
Steven A. Cuculich
Defendant:
John Z. Rigos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc
Hiers v. Speer
as 1:2021cv02508
Plaintiff:
Abigail R Hiers
Defendant:
John Z Speer, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00859
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Francisco Fernando-Mateo v. John Lee
as 20-3294
Interested Party:
CHAD F. WOLF, BILL PRIM, ROBERT GUADIAN and others
Respondent:
JOHN Z. LEE
Petitioner:
FRANCISCO FERNANDO-MATEO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
