Cases 1 - 10 of 25
USA v. Jonathan Parker
as 23-2822
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JONATHAN PARKER
PARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv64550
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN PARKER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv26346
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv19590
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PARKER v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2020cv01170
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Petitioner:
JONATHAN PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wadley et al v. University of Iowa et al
as 4:2020cv00366
Plaintiff:
Akrum Wadley, Kevonte Martin-Manley, Andre Harris and others
Defendant:
Gary Barta, Board of Regents of The State of Iowa, Christopher Doyle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jonathan Parker v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 20-13935
Respondent / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, TONY ANDERSON and SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Petitioner / Appellant:
JONATHAN PARKER
PARKER v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2020cv00832
Respondent:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
Petitioner:
JONATHAN PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
PARKER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv18563
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN PARKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JONES v. MARION COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT. et al
as 1:2019cv04625
Plaintiff:
HENRY EARL JONES
Defendant:
MARION COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPT., JONATHAN PARKER and LASAUNDRA STINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
