Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Allan v. Hebert et al
as 0:2021cv00166
Defendant:
Daniel Maki, James Berg, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Peter Allan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv79840
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HICKS v. ROSARIO et al
as 1:2019cv16872
Defendant:
VIDAL RIVERA, JEFFREY KOSTOPLIS and JONATHAN ROSARIO
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY HICKS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HOPPS v. CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2018cv01411
Plaintiff:
BRANDON HOPPS
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT , GEORGE LEWIS, III , ADAM TUVEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario-Morales v. Metro-North Commuter Railroad
as 1:2017cv08081
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Rosario-Morales
Defendant:
Metro-North Commuter Railroad
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Morgan v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv03899
Defendant:
Police Officer Oldson Ajesulas, City of New York and Sergeant Jonathan Rosario
Plaintiff:
Kadeem Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Rosario-Perez
as 14-2295
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant - Appellant:
JONATHAN ROSARIO-PEREZ, a/k/a Tatai
Interested Party:
OPERATING PARTNERS COMPANY, LLC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
ROSARIO v. GENERAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2013cv02597
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN ROSARIO
Defendant:
GENERAL INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Ramirez v. Lovin' Oven Catering Suffolk, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00520
Plaintiff:
Robert Ramirez , Jonathan Rosario and Richard Mercado
Defendant:
Lovin' Oven Catering Suffolk, Inc. , William Riley and Gerald Scollan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
