Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 74,572
Phillip Jones v. Tim Shoop
as 24-3356
Petitioner: PHILLIP L. JONES
Respondent: TIM SHOOP, Warden
MURRAY-BEY v. JONES et al
as 3:2024cv05738
Plaintiff: DANNY-R: MURRAY-BEY
Defendant: RODERICK JONES and NEW JERSEY STATE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65380
Plaintiff: John Jones
Defendant: Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
AlBritton v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 7:2024cv00283
Plaintiff: DeVinche Javon AlBritton
Defendant: Commonwealth of Virginia, Counselor Kayla Mallory, David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
NLRB v. Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc
as 24-1098
Petitioner: National Labor Relations Board
Respondent: Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc
Jones v. Wyoming, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00439
Plaintiff: Les Paul Jones, Jr.
Defendant: Wyoming, City of, Unknown Party #1 and Anastasia Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Jones v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv00270
Plaintiff: Russell Steven Jones
Defendant: Kiara Jones and Oast & Taylor, PLLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6078
Plaintiff: MELISSA GUNTER, AUSTIN GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant: STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
VanBuskirk, et al v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6079
Plaintiff: AARON VANBUSKIRK, AUSTIN GUNTER and MELISSA GUNTER
Defendant: STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Gunter v. State of Oklahoma, et al
as 24-6080
Plaintiff: AUSTIN GUNTER, MELISSA GUNTER and AARON VANBUSKIRK
Defendant: STATE OF OKLAHOMA, CITY OF SHAWNEE, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?