Cases 61 - 70 of 703
USA v. Gonzalez Hernandez
as 22-10842
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jose Hugo Gonzalez Hernandez
Gonzalez-Sandoval v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2022cv08147
Plaintiff:
Jose M Gonzalez-Sandoval
Defendant:
Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, Unknown Party, Jonathan Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. SCI-Forest et al
as 4:2022cv01237
Petitioner:
Jose L. Gonzalez
Respondent:
Superintendent of SCI-Forest and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez Murillo v. Garland
as 22-1217
Petitioner:
JOSE GUSTAVO GONZALEZ MURILLO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Gonzalez v. McDowell et al
as 3:2022cv04057
Petitioner:
Jose Francisco Gonzalez
Defendant:
Neil McDowell and Ironwood State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gonzalez-Requena v. Key Insurance Company
as 2:2022cv01105
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Gonzales-Requena
Defendant:
Jose Luis Gonzalez-Requena and Key Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv04465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Jose L Gonzalez et al v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
as 5:2022cv01012
Plaintiff:
Jose L Gonzalez and Gloria Sedeno
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00621
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
