Cases 1 - 10 of 336
Cruz v. Capital One
as 3:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Jose Cruz
Defendant:
Capital One
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Licon v. Sheriff of Ector County
as 7:2024cv00105
Petitioner:
Jose Cruz Licon
Respondent:
Sheriff of Ector County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cruz-Gutierrez v. Marion County Courts
as 6:2024cv00626
Plaintiff:
Jose Cruz-Gutierrez
Defendant:
Marion County Courts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen Jr. v. Cass County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00113
Plaintiff:
Roy David Allen Jr.
Defendant:
Cass County Detention Center, Linden Police Department, Jose Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Kline v. Cass County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Kline
Defendant:
Cass County Detention Center, Linden Police Department, Jose Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Macias Vasquez v. Wilson, et al.
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Jose Cruz Macias Vasquez
Defendant:
Jason Wilson, Marquis Garner, Raymund Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cruz-Cruz, et al. v. Garland
as 24-136
Petitioner:
ALEJANDRO JOSE CRUZ-CRUZ, SANTIAGO ALEJANDRO CRUZ-HERNANDEZ, MIRNA REBECA HERNANDEZ DE CRUZ and others
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Manuel Moreno v. Carol Bosholm
as 23-6950
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MANUEL MORENO
Defendant / Appellant:
DR. CAROL C. BOSHOLM
Defendant:
JAPETH BETT, JOSE CRUZ, JEREMY EDWARDS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
