Cases 11 - 20 of 31
Cody Etherton, et al v. City of Rainsville, et al
as 15-15147
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CODY ETHERTON and HOPE ETHERTON
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF RAINSVILLE, NICK JONES, BRANDON FREEMAN and others
Etherton et al v. City of Rainsville et al
as 4:2014cv01832
Plaintiff:
Cody Etherton and Hope Etherton
Defendant:
City of Rainsville , Nick Jones , Brandon Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRAHAM v. FLUIDMASTER INC. et al
as 2:2014cv00293
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH GRAHAM
Defendant:
FLUIDMASTER INC. , JOHN DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPS. 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Parviz Karim-Panahi v. The State of California, et al.
as 8:2013cv00888
Defendant:
Edmund Gerald "Jerry" Brown, Jr., California Governors and their Administrations, Joseph Graham "Gray" Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Parviz Karim-Panahi
U.S. Bank National Association v. Joseph Graham, Tamara Vaughn, et al
as 5:2013cv00406
Defendant:
Joseph Graham and Tamara Vaughn
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Hirsch v. County of Monroe
as 12-3822
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nicholas J. Hirsch
Defendant - Appellee:
County of Monroe, City of Rochester, Rochester City Court, Rochester Police Department, State of New York and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Graham v. United States of America
as 2:2011cv00271
Petitioner:
Stephen Joseph Graham
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Graham v. U.S. Bank National Association, N.A.
as 1:2010cv02196
Plaintiff:
Joseph Graham
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
