Cases 1 - 10 of 102
Perez-Flores v. Sample et al
as 3:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Julio Perez-Flores
Defendant:
Sample and Osborn Correcional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shields v. Mondelez Global LLC
as 1:2023cv03999
Plaintiff:
Michael Shields, Daniel Berndt, Julio Perez and others
Defendant:
Mondelez Global LLC
Petitioner:
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP
Intervenor:
Eric D. Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Rivas v. Conyers et al
as 2:2022cv00789
Defendant:
A. Nelson, Jessica L. Conyers, Gerry Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Yoandry Primelle Rivas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Villanueva et al v. G-Net Construction Corp. et al
as 1:2022cv07199
Plaintiff:
Luis Villanueva, Jose Eduardo Villanueva, Julio Perez and others
Defendant:
G-Net Construction Corp., G-Net Construction Services LLC, G-Net Realty Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Perez v. Pronto Food Service, Company et al
as 1:2022cv04409
Plaintiff:
Julio Perez
Defendant:
Pronto Food Service, Company d/b/a Pronto's, John Miulli and Pronto Food Service, Company doing business as Pronto's
(HC)Perez v. Trate
as 1:2022cv00629
Petitioner:
Julio Perez
Respondent:
B. M. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Perez v. B & D Snacks Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02473
Plaintiff:
Julio Perez
Defendant:
B & D Snacks Inc. and William Delquaglio
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Perez v. Ginkens et al
as 3:2022cv00149
Plaintiff:
Julio Perez
Defendant:
William Ginkens and FNU O'Connell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. Miller
as 1:2022cv01464
Petitioner:
Julio Perez
Respondent:
Christopher Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
USA v. Julio Perez
as 22-1352
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JULIO PEREZ
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
