Cases 11 - 20 of 92
(HC)Robinson v. Warden
as 1:2022cv01369
Petitioner:
Jacinto Robinson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
USA v. Santos
as 22-10902
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jacinto Guzman Santos, Jr.
Jacinto Valdovino v. M. Atchely
as 22-16062
Petitioner / Appellant:
JACINTO JOSE VALDOVINO
Respondent / Appellee:
M. ATCHELY
Trujilo et al v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Alejandrina Perez Trujilo and Jacinto De La Garza
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Gib Lewis Unit, Cody DeGlandon, Individually and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. USA
as 5:2022cv00063
Petitioner:
Jacinto Guzman Santos, Jr.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
(PC) Bishop v. Dodson et al
as 2:2021cv02039
Plaintiff:
Tor Ahmadd Bishop
Defendant:
G. Dodson, J. Saji and Jessica Jacinto
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bishop v. Dodson et al
as 2:2021cv00574
Defendant:
G. Dodson, Jessica Jacinto and Joseph Saji
Plaintiff:
Tor Ahmadd Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martinez v. County Of Rockland et al
as 7:2021cv01276
Defendant:
Rockland County Sheriffs Office, Felix Clereaux, Michael Sullivan and others
Plaintiff:
Odelvin Jacinto Martinez, as Administrator of the Estate of Ferdy Isaias Martinez and Odelvin Jacinto Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey v. Ducey et al
as 2:2021cv00218
Petitioner:
Joshua Miles Harvey
Respondent:
Patricia Starr, Mark Brnovich, Doug Ducey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pena #625133 et al v. Brown et al
as 2:2020cv00250
Plaintiff:
Parnell Seaton #159030 and Jacinto Pena #625133
Defendant:
Unknown Party #2, Unknown Party #5, Connie Horton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
