Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hogan v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv00765
Plaintiff:
Jack Matthew Hogan
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Flowers v. Evans et al
as 4:2021cv00110
Plaintiff:
Curtis Giovanni Flowers
Defendant:
Doug Evans, John Johnson, Wayne Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Sir MatthewsIn re: Sir Matthews
as 20-5699
Petitioner:
In re: SIR JACK MATTHEWS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Matthews v. USA
as 1:2016cv00254
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sir Jack Matthews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
POWELL et al v. TRANS UNION, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv03945
Plaintiff:
JODE MARK POWELL and JACK MATTHEW POWELL
Defendant:
TRANS UNION, LLC and EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Matthews v. Colvin
as 1:2014cv00322
Plaintiff:
Jack Matthews
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
USA v. Sir Matthews
as 09-5551
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
SIR JACK MATTHEWS
Peacock v. Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2008wf17571
Plaintiff:
Jack Matthews Peacock, Jack Matthews Peacock, Jack Matthews Peacock and others
Defendant:
Lincoln Electric Company, Hobart Brothers Company, Illinois Tool Works Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Stewart et al v. San Francisco Police Credit Union et al
as 5:2008cv02143
Plaintiff:
William B Stewart, III, Rosalie A Guancione and Stewart University of America
Defendant:
San Francisco Police Credit Union, Michael R Sordelli, Michael R Sordelli and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Matthews v. Young, Hoychick, & Aguillard, L.L.P. et al
as 6:2008cv00223
Plaintiff:
Douglas Jack Matthews and Douglas Jack Matthews
Defendant:
Young Hoychick & Aguillard L L P and M Terrance Hoychick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
