Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Jones, Christopher v. United States Of America
as 0:2024cv60123
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jamal Jones
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
US v. Kevin Jones
as 23-4713
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
KEVIN JAMAL JONES
Gardner v. Navajo, County of et al
as 3:2023cv08594
Plaintiff:
Amanda Gardner
Defendant:
Navajo, County of, David M Clouse, Navajo County Jail District and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Social Security
as 2:2023cv01756
Plaintiff:
Deonta Jamal Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner Of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
JONES v. WAHL et al
as 2:2023cv02589
Petitioner:
JAMAL JONES
Respondent:
MR MARK WAHL, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. White et al
as 7:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Tehgrain Jamal Jones
Defendant:
Rick White, C. King, L. Jessee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. City of Clovis et al
as 1:2022cv00503
Plaintiff:
Jamal Jones
Defendant:
City of Clovis, Officer Pluss #5823, Officer Markarian #5808 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 3:2022cv00278
Petitioner:
Tehgrain Jamal Jones
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Acia TN Auto, LLC
as 1:2021cv06625
Plaintiff:
Mr. Jamal Jones
Defendant:
ACIA TN AUTO LLC and Acia TN Auto, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv50090
Plaintiff:
SANTONIO JAMAL JONES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
